Or, perhaps, of old and: Or, perhaps, of those old and forgotten grave yards, all of those who remember are now again as one. In which case, such graveyards represent the death of sadness, rather than the breathing existance of it. Let us celebrate the day there are none left to mourn? Just a thought.
Thank you. I still visit the graveyard. I appreciate your words.
Often, promises have a: Often, promises have a half-life that even the creators don't, themselves, know. One reason that people, historically, were asked to swear upon a holy book was presumably that the book was a steadfast cultural idea, it was something that was unchangeable, thereby tying our oath to permanence. Lovers swear upon other books. They swear upon the holy books of intertangled existance as they know it in the moment. Not all promises are broken due to dishonesty. Sometimes, the 'holy books of a lover' change, as a person grows through experience. The way life "seemed to be", turns out not to be how it is. We take it personal. Sometimes it is, but often times it is just that our partner - or our own self, as the shoes sometimes are on other feet - meant every word they said, but couldn't fulfill them once their worldview and their understanding metamorphasized. Once old 'holy books' are lost, so can the promises of lovers attached to them become old, abandoned artifacts, left carelessly perhaps, but not by intent.
I think where I am going with this long winded comment is that you shouldn't lose hope in "timeless promises", but rather to weigh them against what they are attached to. Perhaps that's exactly what you intend with the piece, but the promise of an experienced, emotionally educated, and well-hearted partner carries a much more valuable weight than that of someone who still sees the world through simple tropes of love. Their hearts may be equally good, but the rate at which their promises will be kept may be remarkably different. All the best, learned lover who, it sounds like, is within the camp of the experienced.
There's much for me to: There's much for me to contemplate here. I want to come back and say more at a later moment. But, for now, let me just say how much I loved the phrase "shadowless answer". That really stuck to my bones. Now I'm trying to unravel all that is in your last two lines. :)
Well done set up: Your "set up", if you will, is very well done, I think. This initially called out as a secular love poem in a way that many try but can't quite pull off. Usually, I see it coming. You caught me off guard here. Which, I'd say, is fine writing. The emotional richness leads to a real sort of neck-snapping when having to adjust from thinking of 'love lost' in a relationship between two people to a love lost between person and creator (only to be refound). You're obviously far from the first to attempt to write such a poem, but I would say you did a very good job at achieving your purpose. :)
We can move so fast, that: We can move so fast, that human interaction can be just a blur. A smudge on the glass of our day. One that we can mechanically and without hesitation wipe away, lacking proper pause. I'm still in a long process of personal discovery: is more lonely to walk in a crowd of strangers, or through a quiet woodland? I can only say that, following long stays in a place that could pass for wilderness, upon my temporary returns to city life I've been far more exceptional at not rubbing away the smudge. Perhaps, at doing that "discreet dance". I've unlearned a habit.
I really enjoyed this write, and especially appreciate how it has offered to aid my self reflection.
Just when I think you can't: Just when I think you can't surprise me more with your sincere appreciation and understanding of my vision, you send another heartening gift my way. I can't express how valuable your perception and encouragement has been. May your gift return to you a hundredfold.
This poem took me back to a: This poem took me back to a very pleasant time in my adolescence, when my then best friend and I engaged in a contest (for the bragging rights, nothing more) of writing long short stories for extra credit in our English class; same teacher, differemt hours. His story ran to eight pages, and was called "Return Of The Nazi's In The Year 2001," and featured a suspended animation machine not just for one, but for thousands. However, he did not have the good sense to dispose of them as you did in your seventh line, and his "long" short story was left clumsily open-ended and without closure of any kind. I have not thought about that episode for a long time, but your poem revived the memory. That "contest" was my first foray into the shallows of what I hoped would become a lengthy literary experience (although I was then concerned only with prose, not with verse); and, voila!, here I am today with a devotion to verse and a huge dislike of prose. Thanks for prompting my memories, and I am very glad that, in the world of your story, WWIII was averted.
The short, slender,: The short, slender, conversational lines of this poem conceal a tremendous emotional power that is thrumming just below the surface of the poem.
A Tale Of Desperation: Detroit Tale:
Shot robbing a dollar store, got away. But no cash for opioids or smething a little less legal - bleeding from right forearm, no way to get to hospital and can't get arrested for theft because on probation for wife abuse. $1,200.00 went for food and drugs, homeless, car repossessed last week. No work anywhere...time to be a male hooker for habit support. My death will be a blessing - if you care, anal sex is worse than Heroin withdrawal. Can't feel my right arm. Gang raped last night. Slept in alley - 2 inches of snow fell.
.
Life on the bottom in a big city - not pretty. Middle usa citizens are about to cross a line they thought was a hollywood made up story. On the street - not good, pretty evil, and unendurable. Welcome to Capitalism 101.
~S~
I thank you humbly for your: I thank you humbly for your great compliment. I will tell you of something I suspected in high school---where the reading selections were quite rigidly fixed---and then found confirmation in college, where more latitude was provided. A great poem will inspire and elicit a good, detailed, and thoughtful response. A poem that is not to the reader's liking, or is not congenial, receives only a cursory response. When I took the epic course in January 1978 (there's that month again), I wrote very cursory and flat essays about The Iliad and The Hobbit; but I wrote very detailed, even verbose, responses to The Aeneid and Paradise Lost. I think that part of the comment process is to share, not only with the poet but with other readers, why and how the poem works. Your poems, for example, which contain a whole Cosmology which, like the Universe, seems to be ever expanding into further insights, elicits---even demands (in the best way)---an elaborate response. Your poems remind me of a play, The Satin Slipper, by the Poet and Ambassador, Paul Claudel. That play is so artistically elaborate, and so beautifully complex, that it requires a performance time of approximately twelve hours: and it contains all kinds of theological cosmology, vast horizons and vista, and yet the most exquisitely emotional conversations between pairs of characters. Consequently, the scholarly and critical response to it is much larger, and even more controversial, than to his much shorter other plays. Or, to use another metaphor, in the spring of 1979, I first saw the rings of Saturn through the observatory telescope on campus at my college. The telescope provided a closeness, and such detail, that it seemed like it was right overhead. That was almost forty-two years ago, and I am still excited by the experience; the profundity of the view just overwhelmed me and I am still being overwelmed. That is what this poem, and your entire collection, is like. The centerpiece poems---and different readers will choose different centerpieces---bring all the others together in the splendid grandeur of a constellation. Generations from now, you work is going to be delighting, challenging, and guiding scholars and grad students alike; and they will debate and discuss your place in the literary canon. Let's face it: I know I am not going to live long enough to see that, but I already have had the vision of it (not in a mystic way, but just plain common sense), and these comments allow me to participate in that process by anticipation. In some ways, and I say this gladly, your Poetry is the vindication of all the reading I have done since 1975---when I first began to wonder, what is it like to watch a classical Poetry form itself, and gather itself together, before my very eyes? What is it like to watch a star coalesce out of the swirls and bright colors of a nebula? So it is with reading your Poetry.
The walls we build between: The walls we build between the simple act of sitting side by side and speaking into each others eyes. So poetically laid out, so bluntly driven home. So correct.