At The Home Of Theophilus

Titus received one of Paul's final letters;
the other two were sent to Timothy
(the second, when Paul wore those final fetters).
Although I held the pen that wrote all three,
and penned the words, the words were not from me
(although some worldly wits think "forgery").
They are remembered parts of conversations
we had when he was bed-fast, most unwell;
or also in that last, dark, prison cell
the few times I was granted visitation,
and always under jailers' supervision.
And, understandably, neither condition
allowed for some more comfortable dictation
(as in the past he customarily
preferred).  But for two churches' situations,
Paul directed new expediency:
and I transcribed it from fresh memory.
The world may not yet celebrate one dead
Apostle, but the record---what he said,
and what he wrote, is now wholly complete
(without ulterior motive or deceit),
now part of several churches' history.
 
Starward
 
{jlc]

Author's Notes/Comments: 

This is not an original hypothesis of mine, but is based upon Frank Viola's speculation on p. 160 of his book, The Untold Story.  In my opinion, however, Viola stops short of explaining the mechanism by which the vocabulary of the Pastoral Epistles differs from that of the earlier Pauline epistles.  That mechanism, as the poem suggests, is Luke's transcription from memory rather than at direct dictation, which had been the Apostle's customary method of composition.

View s74rw4rd's Full Portfolio