Mad logic (What will come first?)

I think there for I am, At least I think I am. And if for a moment that I doubt that I am does that mean I doubt that I think? But by doubting that you are is thinking that you aren't but by thinking I am and I think I am not, there in by is my problem. I could stop thinking and there for stop being but to stop thinking I must first stop being there by I can do neither yet both are to become of me. So which will come first, will I no longer think or will I no longer be, but 'til then, 'I think there for I AM'.

Author's Notes/Comments: 

Am i because i think, or because i think i am?

View angelicgothfurry's Full Portfolio
tags: